ArticleATS scholar2025
How I Teach Racial Categorization in Reference Equations Used to Interpret Spirometry.
Article in ATS scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Race has been used in medical algorithms, including reference equations for spirometry, following the assumption that race is a biological concept due to the finding that Black American and Asian populations have lower lung function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity) than White populations. Recognizing that race is a social construct and its use in medical algorithms may contribute to health disparities, this practice has been questioned. This inquiry, combined with recent evidence, led the American Thoracic Society to recommend using race-neutral reference equations for spirometry in 2023. In this article, we share our approach to teaching spirometry interpretation, focusing on the factors that determine lung function and the effects of using race-based or race-neutral reference equations. We explicitly define race as a social construct and review the likely reasons for the differences in lung function found between racial groups. We use an interactive and case-based approach to facilitate learning. As part of our interactive approach, we incorporate strategies to enhance psychological safety for the learners. This is particularly important for this topic because discussions of race and health inequities can be contentious and uncomfortable and have the potential to exacerbate the difficulties faced by learners from groups that are underrepresented in medicine. Our approach is intended for a small group of graduate medical learners and could be presented during formal didactic instruction or informally during clinical teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.