Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586396›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Evaluation of endometriosis patients' expectations of a therapeutic patient education program and comparison with practitioners' perception.

Emma Viteau, Marianne Roy, Jérôme Delotte, Pierre-Alexis Gauci

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of endometriosis patients' expectations of a therapeutic patient education program and comparison with practitioners' perception.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma ViteauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Marianne RoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Jérôme DelotteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Pierre-Alexis GauciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine, Université Côte d'Azur-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-4337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndometriosis significantly affects patients' quality of life, yet its management remains challenging due to diagnostic delays and symptom complexity. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) is effective in chronic disease management, but guidelines are lacking for its application in endometriosis care. The primary aim of this study was to identify patient expectations to adapt endometriosis-specific TPE programs. The secondary aim was to compare these expectations with those perceived by these healthcare professionals.

methodsAnonymous online surveys sent to patients and healthcare professionals involved in endometriosis care explored preferences regarding session content and organization.

resultsParticipants were on average 34.4 years of age (±8.9 years), with a mean delay in diagnosis of 9.2 years (±7.9 years). Most patients (87.8%) would prefer TPE immediately after diagnosis, prioritizing symptom management and quality-of-life improvement, even without a proof of diagnosis for 131 patients (86.8%). No significant difference for patients' expectations was found according to their management satisfaction or their previous participation in TPE sessions. Partner involvement was desired by 69.9% of patients. Healthcare professionals shared priority themes and objectives with patients, but some discordances existed about infertility sessions, psychological support, and sexologists' participation.

conclusionPatients with endometriosis strongly support personalized TPE programs from diagnosis onward. Comparison between patients' expectations and professionals' point of view highlights the legitimacy of healthcare professionals involved in endometriosis management to set up TPE programs but the need for flexible and tailored sessions. This study paves the way for the structured, evidence-based development of TPE sessions for patients with endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisHealth PersonnelPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairespain managementpatient expectationspsychosocial impactquality of lifetherapeutic education

Identifiers

PMID40586396
PMCPMC12724051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.