Trial reportHeadache
Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine in Japan: A dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Headache. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05399459 (Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Japanese Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Japanese Subjects
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for acute and preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of AAC and ibuprofen versus lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term safety and effectiveness of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: an open-label extension of a phase 3 study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Headache · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Consistency of response to rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine among real-world users - findings from the prospective observational CONFIDENCE study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Review
- Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Through 64 Weeks' Rimegepant Treatment for Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy, including dose response, and safety of rimegepant, an orally administered small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, with placebo for the acute treatment of migraine in Japan.
backgroundThere is a substantial unmet need for the acute treatment of migraine in Japan due to undesirable attributes of existing acute treatments.
methodsIn this Phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized trial, adults with a ≥1-year history of migraine were recruited to 50 study centers in Japan. Participants were randomly assigned to receive rimegepant 25 mg, rimegepant 75 mg, or placebo and instructed to treat a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The randomization was stratified by preventive migraine medication use (yes or no). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with pain freedom at 2 h post-dose. Formal hypothesis testing was conducted for rimegepant 75 mg versus placebo. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).
resultsThe study was conducted from August 9, 2022, through January 19, 2024. A total of 706 treated participants were evaluable for efficacy (rimegepant 25 mg, n = 238; rimegepant 75 mg, n = 238; placebo, n = 230) and safety (rimegepant 25 mg, n = 239; rimegepant 75 mg, n = 238; placebo, n = 229). Response rates for pain freedom at 2 h post-dose were 21.0% (rimegepant 25 mg), 32.4% (rimegepant 75 mg), and 13.0% (placebo): percentage difference rimegepant 75 mg versus placebo was 19.4% (95% confidence interval 12.0-26.8%, p < 0.001). On-treatment AEs were reported by 7.1% (rimegepant 25 mg), 9.2% (rimegepant 75 mg), and 6.6% (placebo) of treated participants; all were mild or moderate in intensity and most were not considered related to the study drug.
conclusionRimegepant 75 mg demonstrated efficacy superior to placebo for the acute treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile, in participants in Japan. A dose-response relationship was observed for rimegepant (NCT05399459). PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This randomized trial was designed to test the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine among adults in Japan. Results indicated that rimegepant was more effective than placebo, and the 75 mg dose was observed to be more effective than the 25 mg dose. These results are similar to previous findings from clinical studies in other countries, and suggest that rimegepant can help patients with migraine in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.