ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2025
Transferability, Reproducibility and Sensitivity of Mutation Quantification by Duplex Sequencing.
Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benzo[b]fluoranthene Induces Mutation Accumulation and Cancer-Relevant Mutational Signatures in Mouse Lung Alongside Steady State Levels of Chromosome Damage in Blood.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Type 1 Error Rates in Duplex Sequencing for Mutagenicity Testing Using Vehicle Control Data and Simulation Analyses.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026Article
- Detection of mutations: from Ames test to duplex sequencing.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Application of error-corrected sequencing technologies for in vivo regulatory mutagenicity assessment.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2026Review
- Transferability, Reproducibility and Sensitivity of Mutation Quantification by Duplex Sequencing.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duplex Sequencing (DS) is an ultra-accurate, error-corrected next generation sequencing (ecNGS) technology for mutation analysis. A working group (WG) within Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee is investigating the suitability of ecNGS for regulatory mutagenicity testing, using DS as a model. Initial steps to promote acceptance require demonstrating technical reproducibility across DS-experienced and inexperienced laboratories and establishing the method's sensitivity relative to conventional tests. Thus, the WG conducted a 'reconstruction experiment' to evaluate the transferability, reproducibility, and sensitivity of DS. TwinStrand Biosciences first applied DS to establish mutation frequency (MF) in DNA samples extracted from the livers of an untreated Sprague Dawley rat, or rats treated with either 100 mg/kg/day benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) for ten days or 40 mg/kg/day N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) for three days. Using the measured MF in these original samples, mixtures were then constructed using the B[a]P- and ENU-treated samples to create "MF standards" with target MFs 1.2-, 1.5-, and 2-fold greater than the untreated control. Aliquots of these standards were distributed to seven laboratories in North America and Europe. DS libraries were prepared by each laboratory and TwinStrand. All eight laboratories met library preparation and assay performance metrics to yield high quality sequencing data with MF in the expected 'MF standard' range. The measured MF and mutation spectra were nearly identical across the laboratories and a 2-fold increase in MF could readily be identified in all labs relative to the untreated controls. The results confirm the high reproducibility and sensitivity of DS for mutagenicity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.