Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586365›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2025

Sustainable software development in science - insights from 20 years of Vanted.

Falk Schreiber, Tobias Czauderna, Dimitar Garkov, Niklas Gröne, Karsten Klein, Matthias Lange, Uwe Scholz, Björn Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Falk SchreiberDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Tobias CzaudernaFaculty of Applied Computer Sciences and Biosciences, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, Mittweida, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1788-9593
Dimitar GarkovDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2134-1686
Niklas GröneDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8600-6421
Karsten KleinDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Matthias LangeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Uwe ScholzLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Seeland, Germany.
Björn SommerRoyal College of Art, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable software development requires the software to remain accessible and maintainable over long time. This is particularly challenging in a scientific context. For example, fewer than one third of tools and platforms for biological network representation, analysis, and visualisation have been available and supported over a period of 15 years. One of those tools is Vanted, which has been developed and actively supported over the past 20 years. In this work, we discuss sustainable software development in science and investigate which software tools for biological network representation, analysis, and visualisation are maintained over a period of at least 15 years. With Vanted as a case study, we highlight five key insights that we consider crucial for sustainable, long-term software development and software maintenance in science.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyScienceSoftwareSoftware DesignHumansnetwork analysis and visualisationsustainable software developmenttools

Identifiers

PMID40586365
PMCPMC12327203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.