ReviewJournal of water and health2025
Heavy metals in drinking water sources in northern Mexico: a review of concentrations and human health risks assessment.
Review in Journal of water and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toxic Metal Content in Mexican Propolis: A Human Health Risk Assessment.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the high concentrations of heavy metals (HMs) in the water bodies of northern Mexico, current monitoring efforts and regulations are insufficient. This is especially troubling, given the indigenous and vulnerable communities and the overall lack of public health information. To characterize exposure, we conducted an exhaustive review of HM studies in drinking water in northern Mexico. This information was used to estimate hazard quotient (HQ) and carcinogenic risk (CR) values by age for all of northern Mexico. In total, 316 concentrations of HMs were reported in 55 studies from 1975 to 2021, with concentration ranges of 0-11,100, 0-5,250, 0-350, 0-25, and 0-9,470 μg/L for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead, respectively. The probable maximum concentrations (95th percentile) of metals in drinking water were 244.55, 10, 56, 1.68, and 90.35 μg/L for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead, respectively. The HQ for all HMs ranged from 0.0011 to 404.62. Children younger than 2 years had an extremely high risk (HQ > 40) of presenting adverse health effects from arsenic consumption. Children younger than 6 years had the highest risk of developing cancer, with CR values from 2.24 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
40586334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.