ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
An order-preserving batch-effect correction method based on a monotonic deep learning framework.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing has significantly advanced our understanding of cell heterogeneity and gene regulation. Batch-effect correction is essential for achieving robust data integration. Multiple methods have been developed to address this issue, particularly procedural approaches involving components such as anchoring or deep learning, which have achieved notable successes. However, order preservation, as an important feature, has been largely overlooked in procedural methods. Based on a monotonic deep learning network, we developed a correction method with order-preserving feature. By comparing with existing methods, we demonstrated that our method effectively improved clustering performance, better retained original inter-gene correlation and differential expression information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.