ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Novel enzyme-based reduced representation method for DNA methylation profiling with low inputs.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Molecular Profiling: Emerging Advances in Circulating Tumor DNA Detection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Commonly used bisulfite-based procedures for DNA methylation sequencing can degrade DNA, worsening signal-to-noise ratios in samples with low DNA input. Enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-seq) has been proposed as a less biased alternative for methylation profiling with greater genome coverage. Reduced representation approaches enrich samples for CpG-rich genomic regions, thereby enhancing throughput and cost effectiveness. We hypothesized that enzyme-based technology could be adapted for reduced representation methylation sequencing to enable DNA methylation profiling of low-input samples. We leveraged the well-established differences in methylation profile between mouse CD4+ T cell populations to compare the performance of our reduced representation EM-seq (RREM-seq) procedure against an established reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) protocol. While the RRBS method failed to generate reliable DNA libraries when using <2 ng of DNA, the RREM-seq method successfully generated reliable DNA libraries from 1-25 ng of mouse and human DNA. Low-input (≤2-ng) RREM-seq libraries demonstrated superior regulatory genomic element coverage compared with RRBS libraries with >10-fold higher DNA input. RREM-seq also successfully detected lineage-defining methylation differences between alveolar conventional T and regulatory T cells obtained from patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Our RREM-seq method enables single-nucleotide resolution methylation profiling using low-input samples, including from clinical sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.