ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
The SIBUS-IN Fingerheld Ultrasound Machine.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound imaging in aesthetic medicine: safety and precision in injectable procedures.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Based Classification of Infraorbital Fat and Groove Patterns: Clinical Implications for Safer Filler Injection.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- The SIBUS-IN Fingerheld Ultrasound Machine.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive esthetic procedures risk vascular occlusion, necrosis, and other sequelae; real-time ultrasound guidance mitigates these events, yet conventional devices are bulky and two-handed.
aimTo present the SIBUS-IN fingerheld ultrasound system and summarize its technical features and clinical advantages for esthetic injections.
methodsThe device's specifications, workflow, and Doppler capabilities were reviewed and contrasted with published data on existing handheld scanners.
resultsSIBUS-IN mounts a 15 MHz curved transducer on the operator's index finger, streaming images wirelessly to a tablet. Motion-gesture or voice controls allow sterile, single-handed operation while preserving tactile feedback. Full color, power, and pulsed-wave Doppler modes delineate vascular anatomy; images can be archived for medico-legal documentation. Compared with Clarius, Mindray and similar units, SIBUS-IN shortens setup time and improves access to concave or convex facial zones. Limitations include image variability in highly curved areas, infection-control requirements, and a learning curve for novices.
conclusionBy combining ergonomic fingertip design with high-resolution, multimode imaging, SIBUS-IN promises greater precision, efficiency, and vascular safety in esthetic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.