ArticleData in brief2025
Physiological and behavioral data on active and traditional learning in engineering education.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset comprises information gathered from an experiment designed to examine learning engagement and physiological responses in students exposed to different teaching methodologies. The dataset includes records from 50 engineering students, ensuring a diverse representation of participants. It contains survey responses capturing self-reported engagement, neurophysiological measurements such as electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and skin temperature (ST), along with observational records documenting behavioral interactions during the learning process. Participants were first exposed to a 15-minute video lecture introducing the One-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem, its industrial applications, and heuristic algorithms such as Next Fit, First Fit, and First Fit Decreasing. In the active learning condition, students engaged in a hands-on problem-solving task, using a physical artifact made of bamboo and PVC to develop and optimize cutting plans for a predefined set of pieces, following a heuristic approach before searching for an optimal solution. The dataset is structured to facilitate analyses comparing active and traditional instructional methods. Given its multimodal nature, it can be reused in various educational and physiological research contexts, including investigations into cognitive load, emotional responses, and instructional design optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.