Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586088›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Physiological and behavioral data on active and traditional learning in engineering education.

José Roberto Dale Luche, Claudia Regina de Freitas, Blaha Gregory Correia Dos Santos Goussain, Messias Borges Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José Roberto Dale LucheDepartment of Production, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Guaratinguetá, Brazil.
Claudia Regina de FreitasDepartment of Production, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Guaratinguetá, Brazil.
Blaha Gregory Correia Dos Santos GoussainDepartment of Production, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Guaratinguetá, Brazil.
Messias Borges SilvaDepartment of Production, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Guaratinguetá, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This dataset comprises information gathered from an experiment designed to examine learning engagement and physiological responses in students exposed to different teaching methodologies. The dataset includes records from 50 engineering students, ensuring a diverse representation of participants. It contains survey responses capturing self-reported engagement, neurophysiological measurements such as electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and skin temperature (ST), along with observational records documenting behavioral interactions during the learning process. Participants were first exposed to a 15-minute video lecture introducing the One-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem, its industrial applications, and heuristic algorithms such as Next Fit, First Fit, and First Fit Decreasing. In the active learning condition, students engaged in a hands-on problem-solving task, using a physical artifact made of bamboo and PVC to develop and optimize cutting plans for a predefined set of pieces, following a heuristic approach before searching for an optimal solution. The dataset is structured to facilitate analyses comparing active and traditional instructional methods. Given its multimodal nature, it can be reused in various educational and physiological research contexts, including investigations into cognitive load, emotional responses, and instructional design optimization.

Indexed as

Educational methodsElectrodermal activity (EDA)Heart rate (HR)Learning engagementNeurophysiological dataPhysiological measurementsSkin temperature (ST)

Identifiers

PMID40586088
PMCPMC12206013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.