ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Guide wire misadventure: a duo of inadvertent intravascular migration.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central venous catheterization (CVC) is an integral part of patient care in the intensive care unit. The Seldinger technique, known for its minimal invasiveness, has become the standard for CVC insertion. Despite the technique's effectiveness and safety, guide wires-integral to the procedure-carry risks, including a rare but serious complication: intrathoracic migration of a retained guide wire. Although the overall complication rate for CVC insertion is around 11.8%, intrathoracic migration of a guide wire has not been previously reported, underscoring its rarity and the necessity of meticulous guide wire management. We present a case series of two patients who experienced this rare complication. In the first case, a 25-year-old male developed a right hemothorax after the guide wire migrated into the thoracic cavity. In the second case, a 49-year-old female had a retained intravascular guide wire that migrated from the subclavian vein to the femoral vein, complicated by thrombosis. Both patients underwent successful retrieval and treatment through a multidisciplinary approach. These cases highlight the importance of vigilant guide wire management and prompt recognition of this potentially life-threatening complication. This case series emphasizes the need for healthcare providers to be aware of the risks associated with central venous catheterization and to adopt a multidisciplinary approach to manage these rare but serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.