ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Multimodal intelligent biosensors framework for fall disease detection and healthcare monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attention-Based Multimodal Framework for Athlete-Performance Analysis and Rehabilitation Monitoring Using Vision and Wearable Sensors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the field of human action recognition, the fusion of multi-modal data from RGB and inertial modalities provides a valid technique for identifying activities of daily life and falls. Methods: Our approach uses two reference datasets: UR-Fall Detection and UMA_Fall Detection for ADL and Fall Events. First, data preprocessing is conducted for each sort of sensor individually, then the signals are windowed and segmented properly. Key features are then extracted, where from RGB data we get 2.5D point clouds, kinetic energy, angles, curve points, ridge features, and inertial signals, giving GCC, GMM, LPCC, and SSCE coefficients. The second method employed is Adam to improve the discriminant of the chosen features. For classification, we employed a Deep Neural Network (DNN) for ADL and fall detection over the UR-Fall dataset and the UMA_Fall dataset. Results: The classification accuracy achieved on the UMA_Fall dataset is 97% for ADL activities and 96% for fall activities, while for the UR-Fall dataset, it is 94% for ADL activities and 92% for fall activities. This diversified classifier setting compensates for the variety of data and optimizes the system for differentiating between ADL and fall events. Discussion: The above system provides outstanding results in recognizing these activities on both datasets and illustrates that the multimodal data fusion can boost the human activity identification system for health and safety purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.