ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2025
Advances in neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: Current trends and future directions.
Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of UFT combined with radiotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Venous Resection During Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and Surgical Management for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Requiring Vascular Resection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most challenging malignancies, with poor survival rates due to late-stage diagnosis and limited treatment options. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), which involves chemotherapy or chemoradiation prior to surgical resection, has emerged as a promising approach to improve resectability and overall survival (OS). The integration of advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers for evaluating the response to NAT is crucial for optimizing therapeutic strategies and surgical outcomes. However, challenges related to the heterogeneity of treatment protocols and the need for predictive biomarkers remain, highlighting the necessity for further clinical trials. The aim is to evaluate the impact of NAT on surgical outcomes and predictive markers in pancreatic cancer. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the impact of NAT on surgical resectability, survival outcomes, and the role of imaging and biomarkers in assessing therapeutic response. Studies examining the efficacy of NAT in patients with PDAC, the predictive value of serum biomarkers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and the utility of advanced imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) were included. NAT has demonstrated significant benefits in downstaging tumors, increasing margin-negative (R0) resection rates, and reducing micrometastatic disease. The use of serum CA 19-9 Levels as a biomarker for response evaluation and imaging modalities such as FDG-PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging has proven valuable in predicting therapeutic efficacy and guiding surgical planning. Studies have shown that significant reductions in CA 19-9 Levels and favorable metabolic responses on imaging are associated with higher R0 resection rates and longer survival. Furthermore, the integration of multimodal imaging and biomarker assessment has enabled better stratification of patients and more personalized treatment strategies. NAT significantly improves surgical outcomes and survival in patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC. Advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers such as CA 19-9 play pivotal roles in evaluating the response to therapy and guiding surgical decision-making. Future research should focus on addressing variability in treatment strategies and developing more reliable predictive biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.