ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2025
Applications and Challenges of Auditory Brain-Computer Interfaces in Objective Auditory Assessments for Pediatric Cochlear Implants.
Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Auditory Stimulation, Not Device Type: Comparable Cortical Maturation in Children Using Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Brain-computer interfaces in pediatric populations: research advances, application challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CI) are the premier intervention for individuals with severe to profound hearing impairment. Worldwide, an estimated 600,000 individuals have enhanced their hearing through cochlear implantation, with nearly half being children. The evaluations after implantation are crucial for appropriate clinical interventions and care. Current clinical practice lacks methods to assess the recovery of advanced auditory functions in cochlear-implanted children. Yet, recent advancements in electroencephalographic (EEG) techniques show promise in accurately evaluating auditory rehabilitation in this demographic. This review elucidates the evolution of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology for auditory assessment, focusing primarily on its application in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Emphasis is placed on promising clinical biomarkers for auditory rehabilitation and the neural adaptability accompanying cortical adjustments after implantation. Additionally, we discuss emerging challenges and prospects in applying BCI technology to these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.