ArticleCureus2025
Best Practices for Partnering With Interpreters in Clinical Encounters: A Multimodal Approach for Teaching Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Communicating With Patients Who Prefer a Language Other than English: A Curriculum on Interpreter Use for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffectively working with medical interpreters is a critical skill for all physicians. We partnered with interpreters, students, and faculty to co-design and co-teach an educational session to improve medical students' knowledge and confidence in working with interpreters.
methodsThe multimodal educational intervention lasted 120 minutes and included a didactic presentation, video role-play encounters, and a panel discussion with interpreters. The intervention was evaluated with pre- and post-session surveys. McNemar's test was used to compare knowledge and confidence scores.
resultsA total of 161 pre-clinical medical students participated in the session. Students identified knowledge they learned, including the role of interpreters, the importance of not relying on family members as interpreters, the use of pre-encounter huddles, and appropriate physical positioning. After the intervention, the majority of students identified best practices for working with interpreters (n = 64 (57.7%), pre-session vs. n = 45 (71.4%), post-session; p = 0.04) and reported improved confidence working with interpreters (n = 73 (65.8%), pre-session vs. n = 60 (95.2%), post-session; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This innovative curriculum was unique in its interprofessional co-design and co-teaching approach and introduction of nuanced, contemporary clinical scenarios. Overall, this innovative curriculum was successful in enhancing student knowledge and confidence in working with interpreters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.