ArticleCureus2025
Experience, Perceived Knowledge and Perspectives of Physiotherapists Towards the Use of Virtual Reality-Based Interventions in the Musculoskeletal Setting: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Multimodal physiotherapy including exercise therapies is widely advocated for people with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions; however, many people continue to experience persistent pain. Virtual reality (VR) based interventions involving exercise provision within a highly engaging virtual environment may provide opportunities for MSK rehabilitation. Since physiotherapists will play a key role in implementing VR interventions in the future, this pilot study aimed to explore UK physiotherapists' knowledge, experience and perceptions of VR-based interventions for MSK rehabilitation, with a particular focus on identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation in addition to informing the design/conduct of a larger survey in the future. Methods A cross-sectional online pilot survey was conducted using convenience sampling between June and August 2023. Eligible participants included UK physiotherapists working across any clinical, research, or educational setting. Data were analysed descriptively using means, percentages and frequency distributions. Results From the valid 40 responses, most were practising physiotherapists (n = 33, 83%) specialising in the MSK field (n = 34, 85%). The majority had little familiarity with VR (n = 21, 53%) and knew little about VR for pain management (n = 23, 58%). A significant proportion had engaged with VR for entertainment (n = 17, 43%), while fewer had done so for research purposes (n = 7, 18%). If available, nearly half agreed that they would like to offer VR for MSK rehabilitation (n = 19, 48%) and also agreed that patients might be willing to engage with VR interventions (n = 22, 55%). 'Cost of purchase and maintenance' and 'clinician familiarity' were ranked as the most important barriers to implementation. Conclusion Although physiotherapists have limited knowledge/experience of VR-based interventions for MSK pain management and identify barriers to implementation, positive perceptions towards the intervention were expressed. A more extensive survey, in addition to qualitative investigations, is needed to generalise these preliminary findings to the wider physiotherapy workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.