ArticleCureus2025
Patent Foramen Ovale and Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Limb Ischemia During Pregnancy: A Case Report and Narrative Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patent Foramen Ovale: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common congenital cardiac anomaly that can serve as a conduit for paradoxical embolism, particularly in young patients with cryptogenic stroke. Pregnancy induces a hypercoagulable state that may unmask underlying predisposing conditions such as PFO. Although ischemic stroke during pregnancy is rare, it carries significant maternal and neonatal complications. We report the case of a young woman in her third trimester who presented with an acute ischemic stroke. Initial diagnostic evaluation using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with a bubble study confirmed the presence of a PFO, characterized by a large right-to-left shunt. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was high, suggesting a strong likelihood that the PFO was causally related to the stroke. No alternative etiology was identified after thorough investigation. She was managed with anticoagulation therapy, with input from a multidisciplinary team including neurology, cardiology, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Postpartum, she underwent successful percutaneous PFO closure with a Gore Cardioform device (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE), with follow-up imaging revealing minimal residual shunting and favorable neurological recovery. This case highlights the importance of considering PFO as a potential cause of stroke during pregnancy. It underscores the need for individualized management guided by anatomical characteristics and validated clinical scoring systems such as the RoPE score. In contrast to some prior reports advocating early closure, this case supports deferring intervention until postpartum in selected patients, aligning with current guidelines that recommend a cautious approach during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.