ArticleCureus2025
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Exacerbated by Inappropriate Use of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Following Infection in a Patient With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is widely used to assist airway secretion clearance in patients with neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While MI-E is generally considered safe when used intermittently for cough augmentation, its prolonged and unsupervised use as a substitute for invasive ventilation is discouraged by current clinical guidelines, including those issued by the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Academy of Neurology. We report the case of a 53-year-old man with advanced ALS, diagnosed approximately 10 years earlier, who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) exacerbated by inappropriate use of MI-E following a recent respiratory infection. The patient had previously relied on tracheostomy invasive ventilation (TIV) but chose to suspend its use, instead employing MI-E continuously for 62 hours (28,234 cycles), based on prior positive experiences and personal preference. Upon hospital admission, the patient was diagnosed with mild ARDS, bacterial pneumonia, and influenza B infection. Although the respiratory infection was likely the primary cause of deterioration, MI-E-related pressure changes may have exacerbated pulmonary injury, particularly in the context of acute infection. Rapid improvement in gas exchange and imaging findings within 48 hours of MI-E discontinuation further supports this hypothesis. We discuss possible mechanisms linking excessive MI-E usage to lung injury, including barotrauma and negative pressure pulmonary edema. We also emphasize the importance of clearly defined device indications, structured caregiver education, and regular clinical supervision in home respiratory care. To our knowledge, this may be the first reported case of ARDS potentially resulting from the combined effects of infection and inappropriate MI-E application, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary coordination and proper device supervision in managing advanced neuromuscular respiratory failure at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.