ArticleCureus2025
Chronic Prostate Cancer-Related Symptoms and Toxicities Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Implications for Future Radionuclide Therapy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Men treated for prostate cancer can experience a high symptom burden. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of localized prostate cancer, while radionuclide therapy (RNT) is rapidly becoming a standard treatment option for metastatic prostate cancer. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is a newly validated questionnaire assessing symptoms and toxicities among patients receiving RNT. This study aimed to characterize long-term, patient-reported symptoms in prostate cancer survivors treated with SBRT using the FACT-RNT questionnaire, and to explore whether such symptoms may inform risk stratification for future RNT candidacy. Methodology We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of symptoms and toxicities after prostate SBRT using the FACT-RNT, a 15-item questionnaire assessing common RNT-related symptoms and toxicities across several domains, including fatigue, salivary/lacrimal gland dysfunction, gastrointestinal (GI) difficulties, and pain. Responses to individual questions were grouped into three clinically relevant categories (i.e., absent ("not at all"), mild ("a little bit" to "somewhat"), moderate to severe ("quite a bit" to "very much")). Standard error was calculated at a 95% confidence interval. However, there are methodological limits to linking SBRT symptoms directly with RNT tolerance. Results Prostate cancer patients (N = 296) who had completed SBRT a median of six years prior (range = 0-13 years) completed the FACT-RNT questionnaire at a response rate of 49.5% (296 of 598 consented patients). Patients completed prostate SBRT at a median of six years before questionnaire administration (range = 0-13 years). The median age of responders was 78 years, 76% of patients were white, and 69% were of intermediate risk disease. Overall, 25% of respondents were mildly (21%) or moderately to severely (4%) bothered by treatment side effects. Respondents endorsed at least mild fatigue (53%), xerostomia (29%), constipation (23%), and pain (20%). Conclusions A notable percentage of prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT report toxicities commonly associated with RNT, such as fatigue, salivary/lacrimal gland dysfunction, GI difficulties, and pain. Results of this study underscore the importance of administering the FACT-RNT before RNT treatment to obtain a baseline assessment of symptoms, evaluate pre-treatment risk for RNT toxicities (e.g., salivary gland dysfunction), and better differentiate baseline abnormalities in function from RNT-related side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.