ReviewCureus2025
Minimally Invasive Surgery as a Viable Treatment Alternative for Spondylodiscitis in Patients With Neurologic Deficit: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of a multidimensional and process-oriented evaluation system in PELD bridging therapy for lumbar spinal infections: a self-controlled retrospective study of 27 cases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is a severe infection affecting the spine, characterized by inflammation of the intervertebral disc and adjacent vertebrae. It can lead to significant morbidity due to complications like spinal instability and neurological deficits. This literature review examines the current approaches in managing pyogenic spondylodiscitis, focusing on surgical interventions, early detection, and the role of antibiotic therapy. The review highlights that surgical intervention is often required when extensive bony destruction, neural compression, or kyphotic deformity compromises spinal mechanics and function. We performed the review study according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using MeSH terms such as pyogenic spondylodiscitis, spinal instability, epidural abscess, neurological deficits, surgical intervention, and early decompression through various search machines such as PubMed-NCBI, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase. Initially, 176 studies were identified in a primary search for screening. After excluding papers that did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, 50 studies were included. Neurological deficits are common and often result from epidural abscesses, which necessitate timely surgical decompression to prevent permanent damage. Delays in treatment can worsen the condition, requiring emergency interventions to address abscesses and prevent progressive disability. This review aims to analyze and understand whether the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach can be as sufficient as the open surgical approach in treating spondylodiscitis with neurologic deficit and to evaluate the quality of the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.