Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585701›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Real-Time Adaptive Respiratory Motion Compensation With Stent-Based Tracking.

Lee C Goddard, Byung-Han Rhieu, Wolfgang A Tomé

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lee C GoddardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA.
Byung-Han RhieuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA.
Wolfgang A ToméDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a promising treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but its precision is challenged by respiratory-induced tumor motion. The Radixact Synchrony system integrates real-time motion tracking using internal and external surrogates, potentially enabling reduced treatment margins. In this case study, we report on an 85-year-old female patient with pancreatic cancer who underwent SBRT planning using an implanted biliary stent as a surrogate for tumor motion tracking. Initial assessments, including 4DCT analysis and Synchrony simulation, indicated minimal motion discrepancy between the stent and tumor, supporting its use as a tracking target. However, at the time of treatment, a ~25° rotation of the stent and intermittent external LED signal interruptions impaired motion model accuracy, leading to repeated tracking failures and treatment abortion. The patient was subsequently treated using a free-breathing internal target volume approach. This case highlights both the potential and limitations of using biliary stents as surrogates in real-time motion-adaptive SBRT. It underscores the need for robust quality assurance, improved tracking technologies, and consideration of online adaptive strategies to account for anatomical and surrogate variability. Further investigation is warranted to optimize motion management in pancreatic SBRT utilizing stents as tracking target surrogates.

Indexed as

adaptive motion managementinternal biliary stentorgan-motion trackingpancreas tumorsradixact synchrony

Identifiers

PMID40585701
PMCPMC12204119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.