ArticleCureus2025
An Unusual Diagnostic Journey of a Spontaneously Resolving Breast Mass: When Rare Entities Cause Concerning Presentations.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes an atypical presentation of an enlarging breast mass over the course of 2.5 months in a 42-year-old African American woman, which initially raised suspicion for a serious condition but ultimately resolved spontaneously, emphasizing the importance of considering a broad differential diagnosis in complex breast pathologies. Her past medical history was significant for a similar mass in the same breast two years ago, which resolved spontaneously without medical intervention. Initial physical exam findings, including skin ulcerations and nipple retraction, raised suspicion for inflammatory breast cancer. The patient underwent a biopsy of the right breast and positive axillary lymph node. The biopsy revealed acute and chronic inflammation, granulation-type tissue, and focal granuloma with suppuration, but no evidence of malignancy. The discordance between the patient's physical exam findings and the biopsy results prompted the medical team to consider alternative diagnoses, such as idiopathic granulomatous mastitis and cat scratch disease. Due to the discrepancy, the patient was asked to return in one month for a repeat biopsy. However, upon her return, the breast mass and positive axillary lymph node had decreased in size significantly, with the ulcerated areas showing signs of healing. The medical team decided to forego the repeat biopsy and instead closely monitor the patient's condition. This case underscores the importance of considering a wide range of potential diagnoses, integrating clinical, radiological, and pathological findings, and adopting a multidisciplinary approach to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management in complex clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.