Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585635›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Reliability of Antemortem CT Scan Findings as an Adjunct to Autopsy in Visualizing Intracranial Hemorrhage.

Jyoti Barwa, Anil Mittal, Sunil Khanna, Gaurav Pradhan, Rattan Singh, Ajay Kumar, Monika Tanwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jyoti BarwaForensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Anil MittalForensic Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), New Delhi, IND.
Sunil KhannaForensic Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), New Delhi, IND.
Gaurav PradhanRadiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College (MAMC), New Delhi, IND.
Rattan SinghForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Ajay KumarForensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Bathinda, IND.
Monika TanwarInfection Control, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction A number of studies have been conducted worldwide comparing postmortem CT with autopsy findings, highlighting the significance of each. However, the question arises: in countries where such facilities are not available, can diagnostic antemortem CT, performed during treatment, be used as an adjunct to autopsy? This study was carried out to compare antemortem CT scan and autopsy findings of intracranial haemorrhages in cases of fatal head injuries. Materials and methods The study comprised a total of 55 cases of fatal head injuries that were brought for medico-legal postmortem examination at a tertiary care hospital during a period of one year. The various intracranial haemorrhages were duly noted during the autopsy procedure and subsequently compared retrospectively with the respective antemortem CT scan findings. Results and conclusion In the current study, the specificity was found to be 100% for subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and brain haemorrhage (BH). In contrast to the above-mentioned haemorrhages, specificity was 50% for cerebral contusions. The areas of the temporal lobe, occipital lobe, and cerebellum were poorly visualized on CT scan; hence, the sensitivity of detecting contusions in these sites was 35.7%, 40%, and 30.7%, respectively. Thus, we would like to emphasize that when antemortem CT and autopsy findings are considered together, a wider range of information can be gathered.

Indexed as

antemortem ct scanautopsyfatal head injuriesintracranial hemorrhagesnon-invasive technique

Identifiers

PMID40585635
PMCPMC12202714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.