Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585634›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Fostering Interprofessional Education and Practice: Organizational Outcomes of a Faculty Development Program for Educators Across Health Professions.

Gayle Haischer-Rollo, Diane Hale, James D Honeycutt, Rhiana Saunders, William Bowers, Ryan Sanborn, Reece Tuckerman, John Nowell, Thomas McFate, Jessica Servey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gayle Haischer-RolloDepartment of Faculty Affairs and Faculty Development, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Diane HaleDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA.
James D HoneycuttDepartment of Family Medicine, Mike O'Callaghan Military Medical Center, Clark County, USA.
Rhiana SaundersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, USA.
William BowersF. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Ryan SanbornF. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Reece TuckermanF. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
John NowellF. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Thomas McFateDepartment of Faculty Affairs and Faculty Development, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
Jessica ServeyDepartment of Faculty Affairs and Faculty Development, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The role of clinician educators has expanded to encompass diverse responsibilities alongside providing competent care and engaging in scholarly activities. Faculty development (FD) programs have emerged as vital tools for equipping educators with teaching skills and career advancement opportunities. However, assessing faculty development programs' impact on organizational culture remains challenging due to their multifaceted nature. This study explores this gap to understand how faculty development influences organizational culture. Methods This qualitative study used a constructivist approach to explore faculty perspectives on the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU) Faculty Development Program's influence on organizational culture. Forty-three faculty members participated in nine semi-structured focus groups, selected for diversity across roles and locations. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and anonymized to ensure accuracy and participant confidentiality. Data analysis Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. A multidisciplinary team independently reviewed transcripts, identified preliminary codes, and refined themes through iterative consensus building. Coding was organized using memos and grouped into themes. Using information power principles, the team determined that nine focus groups provided sufficient data richness to meet the study's aims. Results The research team identified and refined four central themes: professionalization, legitimization, the value of community, and leadership impact. The participants reported a greater sense of professionalization through enhanced teaching skills, increased awareness of educational literature, and heightened confidence in their educator roles. The faculty development program fostered a strong community, promoting collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mutual support across specialties and locations. Leadership impact was evident at individual and institutional levels, increasing confidence, mentorship, and organizational support. Conclusions This study provides valuable insights into the organizational impact of faculty development programs, shedding light on how such initiatives influence faculty experiences and organizational culture. Future research should explore leadership values, faculty retention, burnout prevention, and the broader value of education within academic institutions.

Indexed as

culture changeeducational culturefaculty developmentinterprofessional educationorganizational culture

Identifiers

PMID40585634
PMCPMC12205630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.