Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585602›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Weight-Bearing Approaches After Neck of Femur Fractures: A Narrative Review of Evidence and Outcomes.

Niketa Patel, Mahima Chaudhari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niketa PatelDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Physiotherapy, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Vadodara, IND.
Mahima ChaudhariDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Physiotherapy, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Vadodara, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck of femur fractures, a prevalent injury among the elderly, significantly impair mobility, independence, and quality of life. The timing and extent of weight bearing post-surgery are critical to recovery, yet clinical practices vary widely. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on weight-bearing strategies following neck of femur fractures, focusing on their impact on functional outcomes, complications, and hospital stay duration. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2012 and 2024. The keywords, along with the Boolean operators utilized, consisted of "Neck of femur fracture", OR "Hip fracture", AND "Weight bearing", AND "Mobilization", OR "Mobility", OR "Ambulation", OR "Gait training", to inculcate appropriate literature. The studies reported that early weight bearing (within 24 to 48 hours post-surgery) and full weight bearing are strongly supported for enhancing mobility, reducing hospital stays, and mitigating complications like pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and deep vein thrombosis. Partial weight bearing, while practiced, is less effective due to poor compliance in geriatric patients, often leading to immobility. Delayed and non-weight-bearing approaches are associated with prolonged recovery and increased complications. Fracture type, surgical approach, and patient characteristics influence optimal strategies. In conclusion, early full weight bearing is the preferred approach for geriatric patients' post-neck of femur fractures, promoting functional recovery and reducing complications. However, standardized protocols are needed to address practice variability.

Indexed as

fracture neck of femurhip fracturemobilizationpost-operative rehabilitationweight bearing

Identifiers

PMID40585602
PMCPMC12202982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.