ArticleCureus2025
Sepsis Among Hospitalized Patients: Events in the 30 Days Preceding the Diagnosis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection, and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally. This study was undertaken to investigate the role of healthcare encounters and diagnostic test results in the 30 days preceding a sepsis diagnosis. Methods In this single-center retrospective chart review, eligible subjects were 18 years of age and older who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with either sepsis or septic shock in the ED or inpatient setting between January 2020 and September 2023. Healthcare encounters such as laboratory and diagnostic studies obtained within 30 days prior to the diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock were included in the analysis. Results A total of 363 ED patients with a diagnosis of sepsis were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 64 years (range 18-99), with 47% being women. At ED presentation, 202 (66%) had an abnormal chest radiograph, and 224 (75%) had an abnormal EKG. Final disposition included discharge home from inpatient setting (n=171; 48%), deceased (n=63; 17.55%), and transfer to an extended care facility (ECF) or rehabilitation center (n=125; 34.82%). A substantial number had a healthcare encounter within the previous 30 days prior to the diagnosis of sepsis (n=131; 36%; range: 1-28). Types of healthcare encounters included ED visit (n=113; 31%), inpatient hospitalization (n=85; 23%), outpatient visit (n=77; 21%), ECF (n=5; 1.2%), and home health visit (n=2; 0.5%). Patients with more encounters within 30 days had higher mortality (deceased patients had a mean of 4.6 visits (95%CI: 3.0, 6.1), and patients discharged home had a mean of 3.0 visits (95%CI (2.3, 3.6) (p = 0.03). Older patients were more likely to be transferred to an ECF/rehabilitation center than discharged home (mean age of patients transferred to ECF: 70.9, 95%CI 68.4, 73.4; mean age of patients discharged home: 58.6, 95%CI 55.7, 61.5; p<0.0001). Conclusions Patients with a diagnosis of sepsis frequently had one or more healthcare encounters and diagnostic tests within 30 days prior to the diagnosis. Abnormal diagnostic tests, including creatinine, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase, were associated with higher mortality. Patients with more healthcare encounters and older patients had higher mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.