ReviewCureus2025
Rates of Adjacent Segment Disease in Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Rods After Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiological Outcomes of PEEK Versus Rigid Rod Stabilization in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery: The Role of Preoperative and Postoperative Findings in Adjacent Segment Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common complication and cause of reoperation following lumbar spinal fusion. Although most commonly performed with titanium or other metal rods, the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods in spinal fusion has increased. It has been hypothesized that the material properties of PEEK, compared to titanium, allow for less strain on, and therefore less degeneration of, segments adjacent to the fused segments. A systematic search of PubMed and ScienceDirect returned 967 abstracts, of which 13 full-text articles were included in the PEEK rod group and 12 articles were included in the titanium rod group. The two cohorts had similar sex distributions, although the PEEK rod group was significantly younger (61.1 years vs. 62.5 years, p < 0.0001). A meta-analysis using a random effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation resulted in an overall incidence rate of 0.026 cases per person-year in the PEEK rod group (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.010-0.043) and an overall incidence rate of 0.024 cases per person-year in the titanium rod group (95% CI = 0.014-0.033). One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant difference in the incidence rates of ASD between the two groups (p = 0.8422). In conclusion, there is no evidence of any difference in the rate of ASD when performing lumbar fusions with PEEK rods versus titanium rods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.