ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Are HIV Treatment Clients Offered a Choice of Differentiated Service Delivery Models? Evidence from Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05902572 (Outcomes of Differentiated Models of Service Delivery for HIV Treatment at Sentinel Sites in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes of Differentiated Models of Service Delivery for HIV Treatment at Sentinel Sites in Zambia (Sentinel-Zambia)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Age, sex-and what else? Rethinking priorities to close gaps in the HIV care cascade.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV aim to increase patient-centeredness, a concept that incorporates patient choice of service delivery options. We explored choice in DSD model enrollment at 42 public sector clinics in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia. Methods: From 09/2022-05/2023, we surveyed people receiving HIV treatment to ask if they had a choice about DSD model enrollment and healthcare providers about their practices in offering choice. We estimated risk differences for ART clients' self-reported offer of choice and report risk differences. We thematically analyzed open-ended questions and report key themes. Results: We enrolled 1049 people receiving HIV treatment (Malawi 409, South Africa 362, Zambia 278) and 404 providers (Malawi 110, South Africa 175, Zambia 119). The proportion of study participants indicating that they had been offered a choice ranged from 4% in Malawi to 17% in Zambia to 47% in South Africa. Over 90% of people receiving HIV treatment in all three countries reported that they were happy to be enrolled in their current DSD model. Participants from urban (ARD 0.94 [0.90-0.99]) and medium-volume facilities (2000-4000 ART clients, 0.91 [0.84-0.98]) were slightly less likely to be offered DSD enrollment. Participants in community-based models 1.21 [1.12-1.30] and those satisfied with their current model 1.06 [1.01-1.13] were more likely to be offered a choice. Among providers, 64% in Malawi, 80% in South Africa, and 59% in Zambia said they offered clients the choice to enroll in DSD or remain in conventional care. Conclusion: As of 2023, relatively few people receiving HIV treatment in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia reported being offered a choice about enrolling in a DSD model, despite most providers reporting offering such a choice. The value of patient choice in improving clinical outcomes and satisfaction should be explored further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.