Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585546›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Deep learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.

Brian A Zaboski, Lora Bednarek, Karen Ayoub, Christopher Pittenger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian A ZaboskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Lora BednarekUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Karen AyoubDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Christopher PittengerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors, with significant barriers to timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Deep learning, a subset of machine learning, offers promising tools to address these challenges by leveraging large, complex datasets to identify OCD, classify symptoms, and predict treatment outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes findings from 10 studies that applied deep learning to OCD research. Results demonstrate high accuracy in diagnostic classification (80-98%) using neuroimaging, EEG, and clinical data, as well as promising applications in symptom classification and treatment response prediction. However, current models are limited by small sample sizes, lack of comparative treatment predictions, and minimal focus on early response detection or scalable monitoring solutions. Emerging opportunities include leveraging passively collected data, such as wearable sensors or electronic medical records, to enhance early detection and continuous symptom tracking. Future research should prioritize multimodal datasets, prospective study designs, and clinically implementable models to translate deep learning advancements into precision psychiatry for OCD.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnostic predictionmachine learningneuroimagingobsessive-compulsive disorderprecision psychiatrytreatment prediction

Identifiers

PMID40585546
PMCPMC12202444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.