ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Deep learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder from Resting-State EEG Using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Pilot Study.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Commentary: Deep learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors, with significant barriers to timely diagnosis and effective treatment. Deep learning, a subset of machine learning, offers promising tools to address these challenges by leveraging large, complex datasets to identify OCD, classify symptoms, and predict treatment outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes findings from 10 studies that applied deep learning to OCD research. Results demonstrate high accuracy in diagnostic classification (80-98%) using neuroimaging, EEG, and clinical data, as well as promising applications in symptom classification and treatment response prediction. However, current models are limited by small sample sizes, lack of comparative treatment predictions, and minimal focus on early response detection or scalable monitoring solutions. Emerging opportunities include leveraging passively collected data, such as wearable sensors or electronic medical records, to enhance early detection and continuous symptom tracking. Future research should prioritize multimodal datasets, prospective study designs, and clinically implementable models to translate deep learning advancements into precision psychiatry for OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.