ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Task-shifting in dementia care: a comparative analysis of consultation models and proposed collaborative ecosystem in Japan.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With an aging population, task-shifting in dementia care has been proposed to meet the needs of persons living with dementia (PLWD). In Japan, the Initial-phase Intensive Support Service (IPIS), led by primary care physicians, was introduced alongside traditional Psychogeriatric Services (PS), which are psychiatrist-led. However, the impact of this shift on care capacity remains unclear. Methods: This study employed a convergent mixed-methods design to examine two dementia outreach services in Tokyo: PS and IPIS. This study aimed to: 1) compare the content of consultations between PS and IPIS; 2) identify tasks that could not be shifted; and 3) propose a collaborative care model to address identified service gaps. We analyzed 121 PS cases and 213 IPIS case records, and conducted interviews with team members to explore cases where IPIS was perceived as less equipped. Results: The IPIS Service was generally suitable for early-stage dementia without severe behavioral symptoms but less equipped to manage: 1) mental health conditions beyond dementia; 2) long-standing psychosocial issues; and 3) acute crises-areas where PS traditionally intervened. Discussion: The findings highlight the need for strengthened collaboration between primary care and psychiatric services. We propose a collaborative care ecosystem in which primary care physicians lead community-based dementia care, supported by psychogeriatric consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.