Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585534›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Task-shifting in dementia care: a comparative analysis of consultation models and proposed collaborative ecosystem in Japan.

Kae Ito, Tsuyoshi Okamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kae ItoTokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyoshi OkamuraTokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With an aging population, task-shifting in dementia care has been proposed to meet the needs of persons living with dementia (PLWD). In Japan, the Initial-phase Intensive Support Service (IPIS), led by primary care physicians, was introduced alongside traditional Psychogeriatric Services (PS), which are psychiatrist-led. However, the impact of this shift on care capacity remains unclear. Methods: This study employed a convergent mixed-methods design to examine two dementia outreach services in Tokyo: PS and IPIS. This study aimed to: 1) compare the content of consultations between PS and IPIS; 2) identify tasks that could not be shifted; and 3) propose a collaborative care model to address identified service gaps. We analyzed 121 PS cases and 213 IPIS case records, and conducted interviews with team members to explore cases where IPIS was perceived as less equipped. Results: The IPIS Service was generally suitable for early-stage dementia without severe behavioral symptoms but less equipped to manage: 1) mental health conditions beyond dementia; 2) long-standing psychosocial issues; and 3) acute crises-areas where PS traditionally intervened. Discussion: The findings highlight the need for strengthened collaboration between primary care and psychiatric services. We propose a collaborative care ecosystem in which primary care physicians lead community-based dementia care, supported by psychogeriatric consultation.

Indexed as

community caredementiaprimary care physicianpsychiatric outreach servicepsychogeriatric outreach servicetask-shift

Identifiers

PMID40585534
PMCPMC12202652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.