ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Formulation and Characterization of Muffins Enriched With Green Pea Powder: A Physical Study Using Response Surface Methodology.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Formulation and Characterization of Muffins Enriched With Green Pea Powder: A Physical Study Using Response Surface Methodology.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to incorporate green pea powder (GPP) into muffins at an optimum level that reduces sugar content. Cooking time was optimized with the aim of maintaining the sensory quality of the muffins. The study employed a central composite design (CCD) and response surface methodology (RSM) to systematically optimize pea flour addition, sugar reduction, and cooking time optimization in muffins. The recipe refinement by RSM included muffins physical parameters (height, density, baking loss, volume, and mass) and sensory parameters (color, appearance, texture, taste, after taste, and overall acceptability). However, functional parameters like oil holding and water holding capacity were assessed and optimized for only the flour used for making muffins. RSM profiling optimized explanatory variables as 10% pea flour addition, 50% sugar reduction, and 22.7 min cooking. Based on this, the optimized final product surpassed predicted acceptability levels, particularly in taste (7.40), aftertaste (7.40), and overall liking (7.60). Seventeen runs were designed using various recipe combinations depending upon explanatory and dependent variables, and based on data profiling, an optimized recipe was developed, and point confirmation was done. Statistical analysis detected non-significant results in height, density, and texture (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.