ArticleBrain & spine2025
A core outcome set for cranioplasty following stroke or traumatic brain injury - The COAST study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Future Directions and Evolution Strategies for the Clinical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes in the global cranioplasty literature. This study aimed to establish a core outcome set (COS) for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for stroke or traumatic brain injury. Methodology: The scope was defined according to the criteria recommended by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. Phase 1 focused on outcome gathering through a systematic review and a qualitative study. Phase 2 focused on consolidation and consensus of outcomes through a two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting. Participants from the four stakeholder groups (1. patients and/or relatives; 2. Surgeons, 3. physicians (non-surgeons), 4. Nurses, allied health professionals, and researchers) individually scored all outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. Variables that did not reach the predefined consensus threshold for COS inclusion or exclusion were voted upon at the final consensus meeting. Results: In total, 208 verbatim outcomes were consolidated into 56 domains. A total of 153 participants completed round 1, with 45 additional outcomes suggested for inclusion. Following rationalisation, four were included in round 2. A total of 109/153 participants (71 %) from 16 countries completed Round 2 and re-scored all 60 outcomes (56 original + 4 additional). Nine outcomes were voted in, and 12 were excluded from the Delphi. The remaining 39 were discussed at a consensus meeting with 11 voted in. The final COS included 20 outcomes (12 + 8) across four domains: life impact, pathophysiological manifestations, resource use/economic impact, and mortality. Conclusion: COAST COS covers key cranioplasty outcomes, as assessed by international stakeholders, including surgical, medical, rehabilitation, and nursing professionals, as well as patients and their relatives. Future implementation will aid in the standardisation of outcomes and facilitate the development of cranioplasty-specific outcome measures, aiding between-study comparisons and improving the relevance of trial findings to healthcare professionals and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.