ArticleADMET & DMPK2025
Rapid detection of illegal selective androgen receptor modulators in unregistered supplements using a combination of selected solid-state analytical methods.
Article in ADMET & DMPK, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limitations of Molecular Docking in Predicting the Selectivity of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs): A Comparative Study of YK11 and Ostarine Across Five Nuclear Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Systematic review of undeclared prohibited substances and pharmacological adulterants in dietary supplements: prevalence, detection, and risks in sport.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Application of Electromigration Techniques in Clinical Bioanalysis of Heteroatom-Containing Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pharmaceutical crime is becoming an increasingly serious threat. For customs officers and police officers, minimal or no sample preparation before analysis is essential when detecting prohibited compounds/counterfeit products, ideally using on-site analysis. Experimental approach: Unregistered dietary supplements containing anabolic substances, specifically selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) such as andarine, ligandrol, ostarine, and testolone became the subject of investigation. Dietary supplements with these SARMs are often found illegally in various fitness centres and can be purchased online. Furthermore, these illegal supplements may not contain the declared SARMs at all or may contain incorrect amounts. Analytical methods such as Raman spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, and X-ray powder diffraction were chosen to identify these banned SARMs in the illegal products. Key results: Using a combination of these fast and direct analytical techniques, in particular, Raman spectroscopy, it was found that out of 16 samples, SARMs were confirmed in 9 samples, while no testolone (4 samples), ostarine (2 samples), or andarine (1 sample) was reliably identified in 7 samples. Conclusion: Overall, almost half of the analyzed samples of unregistered/illegal sports dietary supplements purchased anonymously online in the Slovak Republic with declared content of at least one SARM did not contain what is declared on the label. Thus the combination of several solid-state analytical techniques without complex sample preparation has proven valuable for rapid identification of APIs in supplements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.