Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585410›Full record

ReviewADMET & DMPK2025

Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development.

Magesh Venkataraman, Gopi Chand Rao, Jeevan Karthik Madavareddi, Srinivas Rao Maddi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ADMET & DMPK, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry III.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Machine learning driven LDFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Magesh VenkataramanDepartment of Pharmacology, Acubiosys Private Limited, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Gopi Chand RaoDepartment of Pharmacology, Acubiosys Private Limited, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Jeevan Karthik MadavareddiDepartment of Pharmacology, Acubiosys Private Limited, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Srinivas Rao MaddiDepartment of Pharmacology, Acubiosys Private Limited, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: The evaluation of ADMET properties remains a critical bottleneck in drug discovery and development, contributing significantly to the high attrition rate of drug candidates. Traditional experimental approaches are often time-consuming, cost-intensive, and limited in scalability. This review aims to investigate how recent advances in machine learning (ML) models are revolutionizing ADMET prediction by enhancing accuracy, reducing experimental burden, and accelerating decision-making during early-stage drug development. Experimental approach: This article systematically examines the current landscape of ML applications in ADMET prediction, including the types of algorithms employed, common molecular descriptors and datasets used, and model development workflows. It also explores public databases, model evaluation metrics, and regulatory considerations relevant to computational toxicology. Emphasis is placed on supervised and deep learning techniques, model validation strategies, and the challenges of data imbalance and model interpretability. Key results: ML-based models have demonstrated significant promise in predicting key ADMET endpoints, outperforming some traditional quantitative structure - activity relationship (QSAR) models. These approaches provide rapid, cost-effective, and reproducible alternatives that integrate seamlessly with existing drug discovery pipelines. Case studies discussed in this review illustrate the successful deployment of ML models for solubility, permeability, metabolism, and toxicity predictions. Conclusion: Machine learning has emerged as a transformative tool in ADMET prediction, offering new opportunities for early risk assessment and compound prioritization. While challenges such as data quality, algorithm transparency, and regulatory acceptance persist, continued integration of ML with experimental pharmacology holds the potential to substantially improve drug development efficiency and reduce late-stage failures.

Indexed as

ADMET predictionAI/MLcomputational toxicologymolecular descriptorspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID40585410
PMCPMC12205928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.