ReviewADMET & DMPK2025
Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development.
Review in ADMET & DMPK, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking through the radiation dilemma: development and clinical translation of anti-radiation drugs.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- NMR-AI: An Open Platform for NMR-Enhanced Molecular Representations and Physicochemical Property Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- In Silico Identification of Dual-Action Compounds Targeting TLR2 andDentistry journal · 2026Article
- Polymer Drug Conjugate: A Revolution in Drug Delivery.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry III.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances and Emerging Directions in Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Potential Antitonsillitis Metabolites From Endophytic Bacteria Associated WithInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- ADMET Profiling of the Metallodrugs: A Comparative Review of Platinum, Palladium, Gold, Ruthenium, Copper, and Zinc Anticancer Complexes.Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2026Review
- The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: challenges and opportunities for next-generation antimicrobial development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Machine learning driven LDFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Anticancer potential of Dendrocnide meyeniana through phytochemical profiling, ADMET analysis, molecular docking, and in silico cytotoxicity evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring pocket-aware inhibitors of BTK kinase by generative deep learning, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The evaluation of ADMET properties remains a critical bottleneck in drug discovery and development, contributing significantly to the high attrition rate of drug candidates. Traditional experimental approaches are often time-consuming, cost-intensive, and limited in scalability. This review aims to investigate how recent advances in machine learning (ML) models are revolutionizing ADMET prediction by enhancing accuracy, reducing experimental burden, and accelerating decision-making during early-stage drug development. Experimental approach: This article systematically examines the current landscape of ML applications in ADMET prediction, including the types of algorithms employed, common molecular descriptors and datasets used, and model development workflows. It also explores public databases, model evaluation metrics, and regulatory considerations relevant to computational toxicology. Emphasis is placed on supervised and deep learning techniques, model validation strategies, and the challenges of data imbalance and model interpretability. Key results: ML-based models have demonstrated significant promise in predicting key ADMET endpoints, outperforming some traditional quantitative structure - activity relationship (QSAR) models. These approaches provide rapid, cost-effective, and reproducible alternatives that integrate seamlessly with existing drug discovery pipelines. Case studies discussed in this review illustrate the successful deployment of ML models for solubility, permeability, metabolism, and toxicity predictions. Conclusion: Machine learning has emerged as a transformative tool in ADMET prediction, offering new opportunities for early risk assessment and compound prioritization. While challenges such as data quality, algorithm transparency, and regulatory acceptance persist, continued integration of ML with experimental pharmacology holds the potential to substantially improve drug development efficiency and reduce late-stage failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.