ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Periprosthetic Joint Infection-Free Survivorship After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shorter Versus Prolonged Systemic Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several studies have presented findings in favor of using extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients at high risk for infection. To date, there is a paucity of evidence examining this topic from large retrospective databases. This study explored 90-day complication rates and 2-year PJI-free survivorship in a large cohort of patients receiving EOA prophylaxis after primary THA. Methods: A large national database was used to identify patients undergoing primary THA from 2009 to 2022. Patients receiving 7-14 days of EOA were identified and propensity score-matched based on comorbidities to controls not receiving EOA and subsequently stratified into any-risk, high-risk, and standard-risk cohorts based on infection-related risk factors. Complication rates at 90 days were examined, and 2-year PJI-free survivorship was assessed employing Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis further adjusting for comorbidity status. Results: A total of 4153 patients receiving EOA prophylaxis after THA were identified. Of those patients, 2154 (52%) were considered high risk for PJI, while 1999 (48%) were considered standard risk. Significant reduction in hazards of PJI with administration of EOA was not seen at 90 days (any-risk: hazard risk [HR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.35, Conclusions: No significant increase in PJI-free survivorship at 90 days, 1 year, or 2 years was seen with EOA prophylaxis following primary THA. Reported PJI rates were low across all cohorts, irrespective of baseline risk. Further evidence is needed to adjudicate the efficacy of EOA prophylaxis after THA in addition to possible risks and appropriate indications for use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.