ArticleiScience2025
Relationship between endocrine disruptors and neurodegenerative diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Pollution, Biomarkers, and Dementia: An Evidence Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- PCB 118 Exposure Modulates Chromatin Organization, Ribosome Biogenesis, and Autophagy-Related Pathways in Neuron-like: A Transcriptomic Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Integration and Causal Inference Identify HSD17B1 as a Potential Nobiletin Target Linking Neurosteroid Metabolism to Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Exposome influences: a multi-omics perspective on the combined toxic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate relevant literature published between January 2003 and December 2023 in order to provide updated epidemiological evidence on the relationship between endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). A systematic search of related studies was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. A total of 21 studies were included, with 286,610 subjects for meta-analysis. Analysis revealed that exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.14) posed a risk for NDs, while organochlorine pesticide (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.17) exposure exhibited a positive correlation with ND risk. Subgroup analysis by disease indicated a positive association between EDC exposure and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03) risk. Our meta-analysis indicates that human exposure to EDCs has adverse effects on NDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.