Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585360›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Plasmonic nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic overall water splitting.

Laroussi Chaabane, Ivalina Trendafilova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Strategies for Photoelectrochemical Splitting of Water.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laroussi ChaabaneLaboratory of Inorganic Materials Chemistry (CMI), University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, 5000 Namur, Belgium.
Ivalina TrendafilovaInstitute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photocatalytic overall water splitting (OWS) is a promising approach for hydrogen production, leveraging solar energy to convert water into hydrogen and oxygen efficiently. However, the efficiency of current photocatalytic systems remains significantly below theoretical limits due to intrinsic constraints of semiconductor-based materials. Plasmonic metal-semiconductor photocatalysts represent a transformative solution by utilizing localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) to enhance light harvesting and promote hot electron transfer, effectively addressing these limitations. This study highlights the role of ultrafast spectroscopic techniques in revealing the temporal and spatial dynamics underlying plasmonic enhancement. These insights uncover key energy transfer pathways and interfacial charge processes that are critical for improving photocatalytic performance. By integrating recent experimental evidence with emerging design strategies, we outline key principles for the rational development of next-generation photocatalysts. This work aims to advance the overall efficiency of OWS systems, paving the way for more effective solar-driven hydrogen production technologies.

Indexed as

CatalysisChemical engineeringChemical reaction

Identifiers

PMID40585360
PMCPMC12205832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.