ArticleiScience2025
Decoding olfactory bulb output: A behavioral assessment of rate, synchrony, and respiratory phase coding.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The olfactory system is a well-known model for studying the temporal encoding of sensory stimuli due to its rhythmic stimulus delivery through respiration. Sniff-locked activity is pervasive in the primary olfactory area, the olfactory bulb, and is considered critical to structuring the output of its computation. We tested the behavioral importance of these temporal features using simple closed-loop optogenetics embedded in custom behavioral paradigms. We found that mice perceive differences in evoked spike counts and discriminate between synchronous vs. asynchronous activations of the output neurons. Surprisingly, they failed to distinguish the timing of evoked activity relative to the sniff cycle. These results suggest that, beyond the first steps of olfactory processing, sniff rhythms play a more nuanced role, with greater reliance on the spike rate and synchrony for the neural encoding of the environment, consistent with a gradual transformation of encoding format at successive stages of sensory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.