ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Rhetoric Versus Reality - Embedding a New Relationship Within Integrated Care Systems for Third Sector Organisations.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Within the UK, NHS England has outlined the integral role of third sector organisations as a strategic partner in integrated care systems. This study sought to explore the embedding of a 'new relationship' in the co-design and delivery of 'local' services. Methods: Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted within a local authority area in England, with leaders from both the statutory and third sector. Interviews were analysed using framework analysis. Findings and Discussion: Findings suggest there is a need to go beyond the rhetoric in embedding a 'new relationship' with the third sector. More needs to be done to change the narrative as to how the third sector is perceived, for sectoral stereotypes to be dispelled, to move beyond tokenistic engagement and focus on how improving health can be tackled together. Whilst place-based forms of governance will differ, a greater understanding by the statutory sector of 'local' organisational and individual dynamics, capabilities and perspectives is paramount. Conclusion: The study concludes that policy narratives are not underpinned with institutional structures and mechanisms. Without a concerted effort and commitment to meaningful engagement, there is a risk that third sector goodwill dissipates in the face of the latest iteration of policy rhetoric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.