ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Diagnostic accuracy of the international classification of disease "I26" code to detect acute pulmonary embolism in a surveillance network.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) offer a unique platform for a surveillance network for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) using International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) codes extracted from electronic medical records. Objectives: Test the diagnostic accuracy of the I26 "leader" ICD-10 code for the detection of PE in near real-time in a large, ED-based surveillance network. Methods: Standardized structured language queries were deployed at 91 hospitals to extract data, including ICD-10 codes, on a weekly basis from electronic medical records on ED patients with acute respiratory complaints. We used 2 methods for coding computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) reports to derive a criterion or gold standard for PE diagnosis: (1) research associates were trained to interpret the CTPA reports, and (2) a validated Regular Expression computer program was used to interpret PE on CTPA reports. These 2 methods were independently adjudicated (PE Results: From 6448 valid CTPA scan reports, 442 (6.8%) were adjudicated as PE Conclusion: For low-latency surveillance of PE diagnosed in EDs, the ICD leader code I26 affords high specificity and high LR(+) for detection of acute PE in the United States but has modest sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.