ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
Machine learning models for delineating marine microbial taxa.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-resolved metagenomic survey of 500 samples from 56 hot springs across the Western US.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and health-related quality of life in paediatric inherited metabolic disorders: a narrative review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between gene content differences and microbial taxonomic divergence remains poorly understood, and algorithms for delineating novel microbial taxa above genus level based on multiple genome similarity metrics are lacking. Addressing these gaps is important for macroevolutionary theory, biodiversity assessments, and discovery of novel taxa in metagenomes. Here, I develop machine learning classifier models, based on multiple genome similarity metrics, to determine whether any two marine bacterial and archaeal (prokaryotic) metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) belong to the same taxon, from the genus up to the phylum levels. Metrics include average amino acid and nucleotide identities, and fractions of shared genes within various categories, applied to 14 390 previously published non-redundant MAGs. At all taxonomic levels, the balanced accuracy (average of the true-positive and true-negative rate) of classifiers exceeded 92%, suggesting that simple genome similarity metrics serve as good taxon differentiators. Predictor selection and sensitivity analyses revealed gene categories, e.g. those involved in metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, particularly correlated to taxon divergence. Predicted taxon delineations were further used to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.