Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585302›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Machine learning models for delineating marine microbial taxa.

Stilianos Louca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stilianos LoucaDepartment of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-5619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between gene content differences and microbial taxonomic divergence remains poorly understood, and algorithms for delineating novel microbial taxa above genus level based on multiple genome similarity metrics are lacking. Addressing these gaps is important for macroevolutionary theory, biodiversity assessments, and discovery of novel taxa in metagenomes. Here, I develop machine learning classifier models, based on multiple genome similarity metrics, to determine whether any two marine bacterial and archaeal (prokaryotic) metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) belong to the same taxon, from the genus up to the phylum levels. Metrics include average amino acid and nucleotide identities, and fractions of shared genes within various categories, applied to 14 390 previously published non-redundant MAGs. At all taxonomic levels, the balanced accuracy (average of the true-positive and true-negative rate) of classifiers exceeded 92%, suggesting that simple genome similarity metrics serve as good taxon differentiators. Predictor selection and sensitivity analyses revealed gene categories, e.g. those involved in metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, particularly correlated to taxon divergence. Predicted taxon delineations were further used to

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsArchaeaBacteriaMachine LearningGenome, BacterialMetagenomePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID40585302
PMCPMC12204397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.