ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2025
Whole-Body Bone Scan for Detecting Bone Metastasis in the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Era: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Post-Radical Prostatectomy Prostate Cancer Patients.
Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early detection and localization of recurrent prostate cancer using [Formula: see text]F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with low and ultra-low PSA levels.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Omitted staging PSMA PET/CT is associated with advance disease extent at time of PSA persistence: a single center retrospective analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the detection rate of bone metastasis on bone scan of prostate cancer patients with rising serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following radical prostatectomy (RP) and to identify the predictive factors associated with bone metastasis. Methods: A study was conducted in 120 patients with rising serum PSA after RP. The data collected were pre and post-RP clinical parameters, including a trigger PSA (tPSA) level that prompted the treating physician to request a bone scan and PSA doubling time (PSADT). Bone scans were classified as positive or negative in conjunction with follow-up imaging and clinical information. Results: Of 120 bone scans, 6 (5%) were positive and 114 (95%) were negative for bone metastasis. In the median tPSA ranges of <0.5, 0.5-1.0, and >1.0 ng/mL, scan positivity was 2.1%, 6.3%, and 30%, respectively. Patients with positive scans showed higher tPSA (1.228 vs 0.256 ng/mL; p=0.003) and shorter PSADT (3.5 vs 12.2 months; p=0.005) than those with negative scans. The most significant predictors of a positive bone scan were tPSA (>1 vs ≤1 ng/mL; OR 15.286, 95% CI 2.594-90.064, p=0.003) and PSADT (<6 vs ≥6 months; OR 17.333, 95% CI 1.618-185.646, p=0.018). Conclusion: The detection rate of bone metastasis on bone scans in post-RP recurrent prostate cancer patients is only 5%, but the probability is much higher with tPSA >1 ng/mL and PSADT <6 months. Given its wide accessibility in Thailand, a bone scan should remain the preferred screening test for bone metastasis, with expected positive results in patients with high or rapidly rising PSA levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.