Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585266›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: Protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hillary Lum, Samantha Farro, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Chandni Patel, Brianne Bettcher, Christine Haynes, Amy Huebschmann, David Nowels, Caroline Tietbohl, Jiayuan Shi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05421728 (Effectiveness of Engaging in Advance Care Planning Talks), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05421728 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Engaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits in Primary Care for Older Adults With and Without Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2027Enrolled516ConditionsAdvance Care Planning, Primary Health CareArmsENACT group visit, Mailed Resources
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hillary LumUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-5637-3912
Samantha FarroUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Elizabeth Juarez-ColungaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Chandni PatelUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Brianne BettcherUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Christine HaynesUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Amy HuebschmannUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
David NowelsUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Caroline TietbohlUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Jiayuan ShiUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Carly RitgerUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Prajakta ShanbhagUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Kathleen ResmanUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine.
Rebecca SudoreUniversity of California San Francisco Division of Geriatrics.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
Effectiveness of Engaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits Intervention in Primary Care for Older Adults with and without Alzheimer's DementiaR01AG066804 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LUM, HILLARY · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Mentoring Researchers in Advance Care Planning for Underrepresented Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Their CaregiversK24AG054415 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI REBECCA L SUDORE · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025780NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054415NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) helps patients identify and communicate their preferences for medical care and prepares them for decision-making related to future care. While ACP is recommended for older adults with cognitive impairment, few interventions have been tested in primary care for this population. The ENACT trial tests the efficacy of the ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention, which engages older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in group medical visits focused on the ACP process. Methods: This two-arm randomized trial compares the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention arm to a control arm at 6-month follow-up. The trial will enroll at least 480 patients across 8 primary care clinics. Notable inclusion criteria include English or Spanish-speaking, age 70 or older, and no ACP documents in the electronic health record (EHR) in the past 2 years. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment screener will be administered at study enrollment to identify whether the participant has possible cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the ENACT Group Visits arm or control arm. The ENACT Group Visits intervention entails two group visits, facilitated by multidisciplinary clinic staff. The control arm entails sending ACP materials via mail. The primary outcome is new documentation of ACP in the EHR at 6-month follow up, and it will be analyzed using logistic regression with random effects for site. Secondary outcomes include patient-level ACP readiness, decision self-efficacy, and quality of communication. The impact of possible cognitive impairment on ENACT intervention efficacy will be examined. Survival analyses will be used to examine time-to-new ACP documentation. Mixed methods, including multiple qualitative methods, will be used to assess acceptability, feasibility, intervention fidelity, and other implementation outcomes of the ENACT intervention among patients with possible cognitive impairment. Discussion: This study will determine the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention among diverse older adults, including those with possible cognitive impairment, as evidenced by increased documentation of ACP in the medical record. If efficacious, primary care clinics may implement this ACP intervention that leverages peer interactions and goal setting to support a person-centered ACP process. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05421728. Registered on 13 June 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05421728.

Indexed as

Advance care planningcognitive impairmentdementiagroup medical visitimplementationmixed methodsolder adultsprimary carerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40585266
PMCPMC12204339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.