ArticleResearch square2025
CD40 agonism enhances immune checkpoint blockade and generates immunologic memory via CD4
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been marked improvement in the clinical outcome of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) although serious immune-related adverse effects are not uncommon. Unlike TNBC, ERα + breast tumors are largely unresponsive to ICB. Here we demonstrate defective priming by cross-presenting conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) and a blunted response to ICB in ERα + mouse mammary tumors compared to TNBC. Systemic administration of an agonistic CD40 antibody (aCD40) induced T cell proliferation and activation in tumor-draining lymph nodes and attracted effector T cells to the tumor bed from the periphery. This effect was largely due to activation, maturation and migration of type 1 conventional dendritic cells (cDC1s). aCD40 alone slowed tumor growth in ERα + tumors but its combination with ICB cured tumor-bearing mice, accomplishing a "vaccine effect" and the immune-mediated rejection of tumor rechallenge. The anti-tumor effect of aCD40 effect was cDC1 and CD8 + T cell-dependent, whereas the rejection of secondary tumor rechallenge in cured mice required CD4 + T cells. Importantly, intra-tumoral administration of aCD40 combined with systemic or intra-tumoral ICB - to mimic neoadjuvant therapeutic approaches-induced complete regressions of both treated and distant tumors. These findings indicate that aCD40 achieves DC activation required for the response to immunotherapy in ERα + tumors and further supports intra-tumoral administration of both aCD40 and ICB as an effective treatment that might limit systemic exposure and lower risk of immune-related toxicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.