Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585244›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Differential contribution of working memory to auditory rhythm discrimination in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.

Emily Garnett, Toni Smith, Bailey Rann, Nicholas Mularoni, Soo-Eun Chang, J Devin McAuley

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily GarnettUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Toni SmithMichigan State University.
Bailey RannMichigan State University.
Nicholas MularoniUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Soo-Eun ChangUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
J Devin McAuleyMichigan State University.

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UM1TR004404 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Julie C Lumeng · 2023 to 2026
$39.8M
Sexual dimorphism of neural development underlying childhood stutteringR01DC011277 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Soo-Eun Chang · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Spontaneous synchronization to speech as a window into auditory motor integration in stutteringR21DC019429 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARNETT, EMILY O'DELL · 2021 to 2023
$473k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004404NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011277NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stuttering is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by involuntary disruptions in the rhythmic flow of speech. Notably, stuttering is associated with aberrant structure and function of the basal ganglia thalamocortical network. Separately, the BGTC network has been implicated in non-speech beat and rhythm perception. Supporting a link between the two sets of findings, children who stutter exhibit poorer auditory rhythm discrimination compared to non-stutterers, especially for complex rhythms without a consistently marked beat. For adults who stutter (AWS), data showing a link between stuttering and poorer auditory rhythm discrimination has been mixed. One possible reason may be that AWS have developed strategies for rhythm discrimination that leverage an alternative non-BGTC network dependent timing mechanism. One candidate from the timing literature is the use of an interval-based mechanism that involves the cerebellum. From this perspective, rhythm discrimination judgments for AWS would involve interval-by-interval duration comparisons, which should be expected to place a greater burden on working memory compared to the more automatic beat-based timing processes implemented by the BGTC network. To investigate this hypothesis, we combined data from three studies where AWS and age-matched controls performed the same rhythm discrimination and working memory tasks. Across studies, AWS, as hypothesized, showed a significantly stronger positive correlation between working memory and rhythm discrimination than controls where there were no (or very weak) correlations. Moreover, separate group comparison of rhythm discrimination performance for AWS with high and low working memory scores reveals no difference between controls and AWS with high working memory scores, but much poorer performance by AWS with low working memory scores compared to controls. These results support the view that AWS may mask difficulties in rhythm perception and an underlying impairment in beat-based timing by leveraging a distinct working memory dependent interval timing mechanism to discriminate rhythms.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaFluencyRhythmSpeechTiming

Identifiers

PMID40585244
PMCPMC12204478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.