ArticleResearch square2025
Negative Hits Hit Different.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging of recognition memory reveals that the striatum responds more strongly to Hits (encoded stimuli recognized as old) vs. Correct Rejections (CRs: lures recognized as new), possibly because remembering old items is rewarding. If this is so, then Hits should elicit higher valence ratings than CRs for emotional and neutral stimuli. Alternatively, memory may interact with emotion such that while positive and neutral Hits drive valence up, negative Hits drive valence down (relative to CRs of the same type). We investigated this by analyzing data from 47 healthy participants who encoded negative, neutral, and positive pictures, completed a recognition memory test, and rated the emotions elicited by each picture. Valence ratings were higher for neutral and positive Hits vs. CRs but only positive FAs (FAs; falsely recognized lures) elicited higher valence ratings than CRs. Strikingly, negative Hits elicited lower valence ratings than negative CRs. The impact of memory on subjective experience thus varied: for neutral pictures, accurate memory enhanced valence; for positive pictures, perceived oldness (accurate or not) boosted valence; and for negative pictures, accurate memory reduced valence. The impact of memory retrieval on subjective experience thus depends on the emotional nature of the memoranda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.