Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585233›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Negative Hits Hit Different.

Arkadiy L Maksimovskiy, Abigail Moline, Daniel G Dillon

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arkadiy L MaksimovskiyMcLean Hospital.
Abigail MolineMcLean Hospital.
Daniel G DillonMcLean Hospital.

Funding

Computational mechanisms of memory disruption in depressionR01MH111676 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI DILLON, DANIEL G · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Inducing Mirth to Improve Memory in DepressionK01MH122672 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI MAKSIMOVSKIY, ARKADIY LEONIDOVICH · 2021 to 2025
$872k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH122672NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging of recognition memory reveals that the striatum responds more strongly to Hits (encoded stimuli recognized as old) vs. Correct Rejections (CRs: lures recognized as new), possibly because remembering old items is rewarding. If this is so, then Hits should elicit higher valence ratings than CRs for emotional and neutral stimuli. Alternatively, memory may interact with emotion such that while positive and neutral Hits drive valence up, negative Hits drive valence down (relative to CRs of the same type). We investigated this by analyzing data from 47 healthy participants who encoded negative, neutral, and positive pictures, completed a recognition memory test, and rated the emotions elicited by each picture. Valence ratings were higher for neutral and positive Hits vs. CRs but only positive FAs (FAs; falsely recognized lures) elicited higher valence ratings than CRs. Strikingly, negative Hits elicited lower valence ratings than negative CRs. The impact of memory on subjective experience thus varied: for neutral pictures, accurate memory enhanced valence; for positive pictures, perceived oldness (accurate or not) boosted valence; and for negative pictures, accurate memory reduced valence. The impact of memory retrieval on subjective experience thus depends on the emotional nature of the memoranda.

Indexed as

ArousalConfidenceEmotionMemoryRetrievalValence

Identifiers

PMID40585233
PMCPMC12204349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.