ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Reversing fertility decline in Japan with foreign pro-natalist policies, 1990-2035: a systematic review and secondary data analysis.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- How declines in fertility rates are informing responses within health systems: a protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Can stimulating ownership increase fertility: Evidence from housing interventions in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Addressing low-value care (LVC) in Asia: a narrative review of Choosing Wisely and other initiatives across Asia.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- Converging fertility trajectories across developed countries, 2010-2020: implications for public health policy.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Sociodemographic Factors on Job Insecurity Among Obstetric Nurses Under the Low Fertility Background: A Linear Mixed-Effects Model Analysis and Targeted Intervention Strategies.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Emotional intelligence and childbearing affective reward expectation among female healthcare workers: the chain mediating roles of family emotional labor strategies and emotional exhaustion-evidence from Anhui Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Second birth intentions and its influencing factors among reproductive-aged women: a cross-sectional study conducted in Shandong Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several high-income countries, including Japan, have adopted pro-natalist policy to counteract declining fertility rates. However, the effectiveness of these policies varied across different studies and countries. This study aims to conduct an initial systematic review to identify effective policies that have reversed declining fertility rates. Subsequently, it will apply them to Japan's context through scenario-based secondary analysis. The goals are to project Japan's total fertility rate (TFR) up to the year 2035. Methods: We conducted searches in major electronic databases from their inception until March 27 2025 to investigate the impact of fertility policies. We also extracted a variety demographic and public expenditure data from the OECD, World Bank, and IMF databases for the years 1990-2022. A Bayesian hierarchical regression model was used to estimate and project Japan's TFR trends up to 2035 in Japan, analyzing the effects of significant fertility policies on these trends. Findings: Our analysis included a total of 61 studies focusing on pro-natalist policies, identifying cash benefit policies-such as payment at birth, allowances, paid maternity and paternal leave, childcare coverage, and tax exemptions-as the most influential. Unpaid maternity leaves, universal two-child policy, and Assisted Reproductive Technology health insurance coverage also showed potential to boost fertility, although further research is needed. Countries like Australia, Greece, Hungary, France, and the UK allocate over 1.3% of their GDP to family cash benefits, contrasting Japan and Korea, where the allocation is less than 1%. Our findings indicate that Japan's current cash benefit policies are unlikely to significantly reverse the fertility decline by 2030 (12% likelihood) and 2035 (29% likelihood). However, should Japan enhance its cash benefits to levels observed in Australia, Hungary, and France by 2030, the probability of reversing Japan's fertility decline could rise significantly to 79%, 70%, and 69%, respectively. Even if cash benefit policies are scaled up by 2035, the probability of reversing the decline fertility rate is projected to be around 60 or more. Interpretation: Cash benefits emerged as the most effective fertility policy in high-income countries, although such benefits in Japan were notably modest. Elevating Japan's cash benefit scheme could potentially lead to higher TFR. Funding: HIAS Health, Hitotsubashi University; Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.