Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585185›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Reversing fertility decline in Japan with foreign pro-natalist policies, 1990-2035: a systematic review and secondary data analysis.

Md Mizanur Rahman, Haruka Sakamoto, Sabera Sultana, Miho Sassa, Md Ashraful Alam, Kenji Shibuya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Can stimulating ownership increase fertility: Evidence from housing interventions in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Mizanur RahmanResearch Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka SakamotoTokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Sabera SultanaTokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Miho SassaDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Md Ashraful AlamDepartment of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan.
Kenji ShibuyaMedical Excellence JAPAN, Tokyo, 103-0023, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several high-income countries, including Japan, have adopted pro-natalist policy to counteract declining fertility rates. However, the effectiveness of these policies varied across different studies and countries. This study aims to conduct an initial systematic review to identify effective policies that have reversed declining fertility rates. Subsequently, it will apply them to Japan's context through scenario-based secondary analysis. The goals are to project Japan's total fertility rate (TFR) up to the year 2035. Methods: We conducted searches in major electronic databases from their inception until March 27 2025 to investigate the impact of fertility policies. We also extracted a variety demographic and public expenditure data from the OECD, World Bank, and IMF databases for the years 1990-2022. A Bayesian hierarchical regression model was used to estimate and project Japan's TFR trends up to 2035 in Japan, analyzing the effects of significant fertility policies on these trends. Findings: Our analysis included a total of 61 studies focusing on pro-natalist policies, identifying cash benefit policies-such as payment at birth, allowances, paid maternity and paternal leave, childcare coverage, and tax exemptions-as the most influential. Unpaid maternity leaves, universal two-child policy, and Assisted Reproductive Technology health insurance coverage also showed potential to boost fertility, although further research is needed. Countries like Australia, Greece, Hungary, France, and the UK allocate over 1.3% of their GDP to family cash benefits, contrasting Japan and Korea, where the allocation is less than 1%. Our findings indicate that Japan's current cash benefit policies are unlikely to significantly reverse the fertility decline by 2030 (12% likelihood) and 2035 (29% likelihood). However, should Japan enhance its cash benefits to levels observed in Australia, Hungary, and France by 2030, the probability of reversing Japan's fertility decline could rise significantly to 79%, 70%, and 69%, respectively. Even if cash benefit policies are scaled up by 2035, the probability of reversing the decline fertility rate is projected to be around 60 or more. Interpretation: Cash benefits emerged as the most effective fertility policy in high-income countries, although such benefits in Japan were notably modest. Elevating Japan's cash benefit scheme could potentially lead to higher TFR. Funding: HIAS Health, Hitotsubashi University; Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Japan.

Indexed as

Birth rateCash incentiveFertility policyJapanParental leaveScenario-based analysisTotal fertility rate

Identifiers

PMID40585185
PMCPMC12206145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.