Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585177›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Rural Medical Centers Struggle to Produce Well-Calibrated Clinical Prediction Models: Data Augmentation Can Help.

Katherine E Brown, Bradley A Malin, Sharon E Davis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine E BrownVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-8541
Bradley A MalinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-5175
Sharon E DavisVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-0792-8867

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
Ethics Core (FABRIC)U54HG012510 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$11.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG012510NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models support many clinical tasks; however, challenges arise with the transportability of these models across a network of healthcare sites. While there are guidelines for updating models to account for local context, we hypothesize that not all healthcare organizations, especially those in smaller and rural communities, have the necessary patient volumes to facilitate local fine tuning to ensure models are reliable for their populations. To investigate these challenges, we conducted an experiment using data from a real network of hospitals to predict 30-day unplanned hospital readmission and a simulation study using data from a multi-site ICU dataset to evaluate the utility of synthetic data generation (SDG) to augment local data volumes. Several factors associated with rurality were correlated with model miscalibration and rural sites failed to meet sample size requirements for local recalibration. Our results indicate that deep learning approaches to SDG produced the best local classifiers.

Identifiers

PMID40585177
PMCPMC12204302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.