ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Multiple instance learning using pathology foundation models effectively predicts kidney disease diagnosis and clinical classification.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Histological analysis of kidney biopsies is crucial in diagnosing kidney diseases and predicting clinical outcomes. Recently developed pathology foundation models, pretrained on large-scale pathology datasets, have demonstrated excellent performance in various downstream applications. This study evaluated the utility of pathology foundation models combined with multiple instance learning (MIL) for kidney pathology analysis. Methods: We used 242 hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) and Japan-Pathology Artificial Intelligence Diagnostics Project (JP-AID) databases as the development cohort, comprising 47 healthy controls, 35 acute interstitial nephritis, and 160 diabetic kidney disease (DKD) slides. External validation was performed using 83 WSIs from the University of Tokyo Hospital (UT dataset). Diagnoses were based on adjudicated diagnoses (KPMP) or expert pathologists-derived diagnoses (JP-AID and UT). Pretrained pathology foundation models were utilized as patch encoders and compared with ImageNet-pretrained ResNet50. Results: In internal validation, all foundation models outperformed ResNet50, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) over 0.980. In external validation, the performance of ResNet50 markedly dropped (AUROC = 0.768), whereas all foundation models maintained higher performance (AUROC over 0.800). Visualization with attention heatmaps confirmed that foundation models accurately recognized diagnostically relevant structures. Additionally, foundation models outperformed ResNet50 in predicting severe proteinuria among DKD cases from KPMP dataset. Conclusion: We successfully integrated pathology foundation models with MIL to achieve robust diagnostic performance, even when trained on a relatively small dataset, highlighting their potential for real-world clinical applications. Key words: artificial intelligence, renal pathology, foundation model, multiple instance learning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.