Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585133›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

LDCT-based Lung Cancer Screening and Small Cell Lung Cancer: limited but non-negligible impact on survival. A brief report.

Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Federica Sabia, Camilla Valsecchi, Luigi Rolli, Margherita Ruggirello, Alfonso Vittorio Marchianò, Ugo Pastorino

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta Eufrasia Ledda
Federica Sabia
Camilla Valsecchi
Luigi Rolli
Margherita Ruggirello
Alfonso Vittorio Marchianò
Ugo Pastorino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening (LCS) seems to have very limited impact on small cell lung cancer (SCLC) outcomes. This study aims at describing frequency and outcomes of SCLC in a large LCS population. Methods: Patients with a histological diagnosis of SCLC among the participants of 3 different trials (7473) were selected for the analysis. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the baseline and follow-up screening rounds, while the vital status and date of death were obtained through a dedicated national platform. Results: Of the 396 diagnosed LCs, 28 (7.1%) were SCLCs; median survival time from the diagnosis was 1.5 years, and overall mortality was 71.4%. Screen-detected SCLCs were 20/28 (71.4%); 5/20 (25%) were prevalent cancers and 15/20 (75%) incident ones. Five-year mortality among the screen-detected and non-screen detected SCLCs was 70% and 62.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The frequency of SCLC was lower as compared to other trials. Although no significant differences in 5-year mortality were observed between screen-detected and non-screen-detected SCLCs, the overall 5-year mortality was substantially lower than that reported in non-LCS populations, suggesting that LDCT-based LCS has an impact on SCLC outcome, albeit limited.

Identifiers

PMID40585133
PMCPMC12204424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.